跳到正文 / Skip to main content
LAWMAY路迈

Insights / 法律观察

Overview of Common Legal Disputes on Amazon

Author

Hongchang Deng · 邓宏昌

美国(加州)执业律师(Bar #354529)· USPTO · 中国专利代理师

 

Yi Yi · 易伊

美国(加州)执业律师

Published

2025-08-06 · 10 min read

Overview of Common Legal Disputes on Amazon

TL;DR

Amazon is one of the largest e-commerce platforms in the world. Behind its complex operational ecosystem lies a wide array of legal risks. For cross-border sellers, these risks involve not only the U.S. legal system but also Amazon’s own pl

Amazon is one of the largest e-commerce platforms in the world. Behind its complex operational ecosystem lies a wide array of legal risks. For cross-border sellers, these risks involve not only the U.S. legal system but also Amazon’s own platform rules. If not properly addressed, a seemingly routine product takedown could result in losses of tens of thousands of dollars, permanent account suspension, frozen funds, or even federal litigation in the United States.

This section aims to provide sellers with a clear “risk map” by outlining the five most common types of legal disputes faced by Amazon cross-border sellers.

1. Intellectual Property Complaints

This is the most common—and often the most frustrating—legal risk for Amazon sellers, typically including:

Patent infringement: Especially design and utility patents. If the appearance or structure of a product closely resembles a registered U.S. patent, it is likely to be reported for infringement.

Trademark infringement: Using someone else’s registered trademark or a logo that is confusingly similar to another brand can easily lead to complaints.

Copyright infringement: Using original content (e.g., packaging, images, copy, or videos) owned by others may constitute infringement.

Once a complaint is filed, Amazon often removes the product listing or even freezes the seller’s account. The seller typically must submit an appeal or initiate U.S. legal proceedings (such as a DJ action) to defend their rights.

  1. Malicious Complaints and Platform Abuse

In recent years, competition on the platform has intensified, and some sellers have started using improper tactics to suppress their competitors, including:

Abusing the IP complaint mechanism

Submitting false brand authorization documents

Hiring lawyers or agencies to file bulk complaints

Such behavior often violates Amazon’s policies and may involve legal claims such as commercial defamation, unfair competition, or bad-faith assertions of rights. A seller who is maliciously targeted may fight back through Amazon’s appeal system or legal counterclaims—if they preserve sufficient evidence.

  1. Account Suspension and Withheld Funds

Due to platform policies or risk control concerns, Amazon may suddenly:

  • Suspend seller accounts

Withhold or freeze disbursements

Request additional documentation or explanations

These issues may stem from infringement complaints, linked accounts, or sales of sensitive products with high refund rates.

Note: Although account suspension is primarily a platform management issue, once it involves IP disputes, third-party complaints, or legal letters, it can evolve into a legal matter.

  1. Contract Disputes and Supply Chain Liability

Many Chinese sellers do not design or manufacture products themselves but instead rely on third-party factories, designers, or suppliers. When infringement complaints arise, determining liability can be complex.

Common disputes include:

Did the supplier promise non-infringement?

Was there a clear IP indemnification clause?

Are original design drawings, purchase contracts, or authorization agreements available?

Without proper indemnity agreements, sellers may be held fully liable for infringement and unable to recover losses.

  1. U.S. Litigation and Declaratory Judgment Mechanisms

Some rights holders bypass Amazon’s internal system and file lawsuits directly in U.S. federal courts.

Common types of legal action include:

Patent infringement lawsuits filed in court

ITC Section 337 investigations with swift, broad consequences

Declaratory Judgment (DJ) actions initiated by the seller to seek a court declaration of noninfringement

For most sellers, being sued in the U.S. can be a major crisis. However, proactively initiating DJ lawsuits may serve as an effective weapon to restore sales and counter abusive enforcement.

Conclusion

By understanding the five major categories of legal risk outlined above, cross-border sellers can adopt a proactive approach to compliance, risk management, and crisis response. This guide will break down each risk area with practical strategies and real-world case studies.

Originally published on lawmayus.com · 2025-08-06

关于作者 / About the Authors

Richard Deng

Partner · LawMay P.C.

邓律师主要从事中国及美国商品及服务争议解决,以及专利、商标、版权、商业秘密等涉外知识产权诉讼与无效确权业务,并办理中美商标申请及中国专利申请。常年服务跨境工贸企业、跨境电商、电子烟行业、科技制造业等领域,为财富 500 强、国际连锁品牌、出海科技品牌等多家中外知名企业提供常年及专项法律服务。

在跨境电商争议领域,邓律师专注 Schedule A 批量诉讼的被告应对,包括临时限制令(TRO)项下的店铺账户与资金解冻、通过确认不侵权之诉(Declaratory Judgment,DJ)与「反向 TRO」动议争取恢复被下架的商品链接与店铺经营,以及亚马逊账户冻结申诉、品牌备案(Brand Registry)争议等平台纠纷的代理。在华盛顿州西区联邦法院,邓律师代理多起确认不侵权之诉(DJ),取得了恢复商品上架、并禁止对方继续投诉的「反向 TRO」与「反向初步禁令(反向 PI)」。他熟悉 Schedule A 案件高发的伊利诺伊州北区、佛州南区等联邦法院的程序节奏,能在中美时差下迅速响应、把握应诉与和解的时间窗口。

在涉外电子烟与 FDA 监管领域,邓律师为电子烟及新型烟草企业提供覆盖确权、合规到维权的全流程代理,涵盖行业知识产权维权与 337 调查、PMTA 上市前申请与 STN 状态争议、FDA 执法防御(警告信、营销拒绝令 MDO、进口扣留 Import Alert),以及美国海关(CBP)清关合规与扣押货物申诉。

他代理的知识产权相关案件多次荣获「广东省知识产权行政保护典型案例」「广东省商业秘密保护大事件」、「深圳律师承办知识产权十大典型案例」、「深圳市侵害商业秘密典型案例」、「深圳律师国际贸易、投资领域典型案例」、「广东知识产权保护协会年度知识产权推荐学习案例」等专业荣誉。

他代理的商品及服务贸易纠纷、知识产权等争议解决案件涉案标的额总计达数十亿元人民币。

美国联邦知识产权诉讼 · 跨境工贸与电商争议 · 电子烟与 FDA 监管 · 商业秘密与不正当竞争

Rdeng@lawmayus.com

+1 (213) 682-7241 · 美国 / US

+86 186 8156 7690 · 中国 / China,微信同号

Yi Yi

Non-Equity Partner · LawMay P.C.

易伊律师专注于美国联邦层面的知识产权诉讼及跨境电商争议解决。

具备在美国联邦巡回上诉法院(CAFC)、第十一巡回上诉法院(11th Cir.)及多个联邦地区法院出庭经验,包括加州中区、北区,德州东区、南区,伊利诺伊州北区,佛罗里达州南区,宾夕法尼亚州西区,佐治亚州北区,华盛顿州西区,特拉华州地区及北卡罗来纳州东区等。

美国联邦知识产权诉讼 · 跨境电商争议解决 · 联邦巡回上诉法院实务

Yiyi@lawmayus.com

+1 (747) 241-3130 · 美国 / US

+86 152 2005 1240 · 中国 / China,微信同号

About LawMay P.C.

美国 LawMay 律师事务所

深耕中美跨境争议解决的美国精品律所。专注于美国联邦知识产权诉讼、337 调查、产品责任纠纷及重大商事争议。

Law May, We May.