top of page

Case Highlight | From Rejection to Revival: How LawMay Attorneys Rescued a Troubled U.S. Trademark

  • LawMay
  • Aug 3
  • 1 min read

Updated: Aug 6

ree

Several months ago, a client’s trademark portfolio suffered a major setback due to prior counsel’s mishandling. One critical trademark faced serious obstacles during its U.S. registration process, with the USPTO suspending examination for nearly two years on the grounds of likelihood of confusion and mere descriptiveness. The client turned to LawMay attorneys for urgent assistance.


Upon taking over, LawMay attorneys acted swiftly. They responded to the USPTO’s confusion objection with compelling legal arguments and supporting evidence, successfully persuading the examiner to resume prosecution.


Building on this progress, the team conducted in-depth legal research and advised the client in compiling robust evidence of distinctiveness. Their strategic response overcame the USPTO’s descriptiveness refusal.


As a result of the coordinated efforts of Attorneys Richard Deng, Minzhi Wu, and intern Xinyan Xiao, the trademark successfully advanced to the Publication for Opposition stage—marking a decisive turnaround.


This case highlights LawMay’s expertise in resolving complex U.S. trademark registration setbacks. Through a combination of legal precision, practical strategy, and responsive client service, LawMay attorneys restored the client’s key trademark rights in the U.S. market—earning the client’s full trust and praise.

Comments


Disclaimer

Materials on this website are provided for informational purposes only, do not constitute legal advice, do not necessarily reflect the opinions of LawMay or any of its lawyers or clients, and are not guaranteed to be complete, correct, or up-to-date. This website is not intended to create a lawyer-client relationship between you and LawMay. You should not act or rely on information in this website without seeking the advice of a lawyer. We would be pleased to communicate with you concerning legal matters, but we cannot do so until we first know that doing so would not create a conflict of interest.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

©Copyright 2025 Lawmay P.C. All rights reserved.

bottom of page