Case Highlight | LawMay Secures Rapid “Reverse TRO” for Amazon Seller in Washington District Court

Case Overview

LawMay recently achieved a swift and significant legal victory on behalf of a Chinese cross-border e-commerce seller whose Amazon listings were wrongfully removed following a patent infringement complaint. In the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, the firm secured a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) within just ten business days of filing the case, leading to the prompt reinstatement of the client’s product listings.

Case Background

The seller’s core product was taken down from Amazon after receiving a patent infringement complaint from a U.S.-based patent holder. After unsuccessful appeals through Amazon’s internal system, the seller retained Aria Law Firm to file a Declaratory Judgment Action (DJ). The lawsuit sought a judicial declaration of non-infringement, invalidity of the asserted patent, and damages for wrongful takedown and unfair competition.

Key Legal Strategies & Outcomes

• Jurisdiction & Venue – The case was filed in the Western District of Washington, home to Amazon’s headquarters, avoiding potential jurisdictional disputes and streamlining proceedings.

• Prior Art & Patent Analysis – Through thorough prior art research and patent analysis, the legal team identified substantial grounds to challenge the validity of the patent, establishing a strong likelihood of success on the merits.

• Urgency & Irreparable Harm – The team demonstrated the urgency of the matter and the irreparable harm posed by prolonged listing suspension, justifying an ex parte TRO application without prior notice to the defendant.

• Reverse TRO Granted – On July 22, 2025, the court granted the TRO, ordering the defendant to withdraw the infringement complaints and refrain from further similar actions during the TRO period.

• Accelerated Proceedings – Notably, the court also converted the TRO motion into a Preliminary Injunction (PI) motion, ordering the defendant to show cause why a PI should not be issued—significantly expediting the litigation timeline.

Why This Case was Significant

✅ Speed to Relief – From case filing to TRO issuance and listing restoration within ten business days.

✅ Procedural Efficiency – Strategic venue selection and motion practice minimized delays.

✅ Judicial Recognition – The court’s rare conversion of the TRO motion to a PI motion reflects the strength of the plaintiff’s position.

✅ Precedent Potential – This case may serve as a reference for future similar disputes involving cross-border e-commerce and IP defense.

LawMay’s Expertise in Platform IP Defense

This case highlights the firm’s capabilities in:

• Rapid Response Litigation – Moving swiftly to mitigate client losses from wrongful takedowns.

• Strategic Venue Planning – Leveraging jurisdictional advantages to expedite outcomes.

• Patent Analysis & DJ Actions – Effectively challenging patent validity and establishing non-infringement.

• Injunctive Relief Practice – Successfully obtaining both TRO and advancing PI proceedings.

Contact The Team

If your business is facing similar challenges with e-commerce platform takedowns or intellectual property disputes, the experienced team can help you navigate the legal landscape and protect your marketplace presence.

Contact LawMay today to discuss your case and explore your options for defense and recovery.

Disclaimer: Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Each case is unique and depends on specific facts and legal circumstances. This content is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.