Case Highlight | Successfully Invalidated a Bad-Faith Trademark Registration in the UK to Protect Client's Brand Rights
- LawMay
- Jan 5
- 2 min read
Updated: 7 days ago

Recently, LawMay achieved a significant victory on behalf of a client in an invalidation proceeding before the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO). The trademark in question, registered in Class 25 covering sportswear, yoga apparel, and related clothing, represents the client's core brand with an established presence in the UK market. However, this brand had been the subject of a bad-faith third-party registration.
Upon the client’s discovery that their core trademark had been registered in the UK in bad faith, LawMay initiated a comprehensive investigation and preparation process. Following the procedures and evidentiary requirements of the UKIPO trademark invalidation process, firm filed an application for trademark invalidation on the client's behalf. The UKIPO subsequently issued a favorable decision, resulting in the complete protection of the client’s brand rights.
This case underscores key considerations for businesses facing similar trademark squatting issues in overseas markets:
Proactively monitor and review trademark registration activities in target markets, taking early action upon detection of suspicious applications.
Preserve and gather evidence, such as local trademark registration certificates, sales invoices, advertising materials, official website records, and social media usage history. These documents can serve as crucial evidence to establish prior rights.
In cases of bad-faith registration, businesses may, based on local legal frameworks, consider filing an opposition or invalidation application. Asserting a claim of "bad-faith registration" can further strengthen the position in negotiations and enforcement actions.
Cross-border enforcement is not without recourse. Leveraging extensive expertise in international intellectual property law, the firm successfully eliminated potential infringement risks for the client. This outcome demonstrates that with professional guidance, sound strategy, and solid evidence, it is possible to prevail in trademark invalidation proceedings, remove potential market obstacles, and safeguard the international development of a client's brand.
This case was handled by Attorney Hongchang Deng, Attorney Minzhi Wu, and Trainee Attorney Aria Xiao.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: This case summary and guidance are for informational purposes only. The outcome of this matter reflects its unique facts, UKIPO procedures, and evidence presented, and does not constitute a promise, guarantee, or prediction of results for any future matter. The strategies outlined may not be applicable to all cases; specific advice requires individualized legal assessment.



Comments