News & Insights / 法律观察 · 4/5
Notes from the Front Lines
法律观察
LawMay 在近期美国跨境电商合规案件中，关注到多起涉及 UL 商标侵权被起诉、被TRO、被下架的情形。相关纠纷呈现出高度一致的风险结构。涉案产品通常已完成第三方UL测试并符合相应技术标准，但卖家因对 “UL” 的法律属性存在误解，在产品展示与营销环节中不当使用 UL 商标或形成来源混淆，从而引发 UL 、亚马逊以及其他竞争对手的维权行动。该类风险在跨境电商领域具有一定普遍性，值得高度重视。一、 UL 并非中立的技术术语，而是一家公司的商标在实践中，部分卖家将“UL 标准”
案件业绩
A declaratory judgment action brought on behalf of an Amazon cross-border seller whose listings had been removed on an unfounded patent complaint concluded in settlement in the Western District of Washington after eight months of litigation.
案件业绩
With a default judgment already entered and the client's funds transferred to the plaintiff, LawMay pursued post-judgment motions and negotiation in parallel, recovering over one hundred thousand dollars before the client's year-end settlement cycle.
法律观察
A test report shows a product meets a technical standard. It does not grant any right to use the UL mark. The two are separate compliance systems, and conflating them is what produces these disputes.
法律观察
Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 律所（以下简称“ GBC ”）可以说是代理原告在美国伊利诺伊州北区联邦法院发起“附表 A ”类案件（ TRO 案件）的常客。不少跨境电商卖家也因此知道该名字。而最近该律所代理的一起“附表 A ”类案件引起了不少关注。今年 1 月 12 日 John Robert Blakey 法官在 GBC 律所代理的原告 Marshall Amplification PLC 的案件（案号： 1:25-cv-13829 ）中作出了裁决，因
律所动态
LawMay 开设这个账号，是为了记录我们在美国法院一线，每年多个案件所积攒下来的实际案件经验、教训和感悟。包括那些在极短时间内做出的博弈、在预算、背景约束下进行的取舍，以及在法庭上与对手的每一次交锋，甚至包括一些胜利的喜悦以及挫败的失落。我们将与各位分享我们在这条执业道路上的所见所感，希望通过这个过程记录，与各位一起找到以下两个问题的答案：我们想要寻找的答案一：美国律师在美国案件中，究竟能为客户带来多大的边际效益和实际价值在实际案件中，我们反复遇到一些并不对称但高度现实的情
律所动态
LawMay 将专业能力的可持续性作为长期建设目标。在高强度的联邦法院实务环境中，团队表现不应依赖个别成员的经验或状态，而应建立在稳定、可持续的能力结构之上。近期，LawMay 引入 Iliyaas Mallard 担任 Professional Development Advisor，参与内部专业表达能力与庭审沟通相关训练机制的规划与实施。该角色的设立，系LawMay对既有训练机制的进一步完善与制度化。在跨境争议与联邦法院实务中，清晰、稳定的专业表达能力直接影响团队协作效率
法律观察
在过去一年里，美国司法领域出现了一个显著的新趋势：针对企业网站数据追踪，如Cookie、Pixel、Session Replay的索赔函和集体诉讼正在明显增长。从技术层面解释“数据追踪”，比如以Cookie为例，它本质上是当访问者登陆您的网站时，自动存储在其设备上的小型数据文件。它们通常静默地运行在后台，负责记录登录状态、用户偏好或用户的浏览路径。虽然部分 Cookie 是维持网站基本运转所必需的，但更多引发争议的，则是那些用于分析追踪、个性化体验以及让您的广告在全网“如影随
法律观察
在全球供应链重构的浪潮下，中国企业出海逻辑正在发生质的转变：从追求速度和规模的“走出去”，步入追求深度和价值的“深度入海”新阶段。其本质，是企业必须从单纯的产品输出，重构为深度的解决方案与全球化能力模型输出。对于跨境电商和科技产品企业而言，要想在海外市场真正扎下根，仅仅依靠线上远程操控或第三方代理，已难以应对日益复杂的平台合规要求与本土化竞争压力。近期我们在协助不少客户进行出海架构搭建，无论是为了规避贸易摩擦、建立响应迅速的海外供应链，还是为了打通当地核心商超渠道，实现深度的
法律观察
2025年8月，美国专利商标局（USPTO）针对违规提交行为展开集中清理行动，一次性终止了数万件商标申请与注册记录。对许多中国出海企业而言，这并不是一次“突发事件”，而是一场迟到多年的风险清算。在我们处理的案件中，反复出现同一类情况：企业已经跑通商业模式，形成稳定现金流，品牌也已在亚马逊等平台完成备案、积累多年商誉、评价，却因为历史上的商标申请路径问题，在多年后集中暴露风险。这些问题，往往并不发生在当下。它们被埋在很多年前。一、风险为什么总是在 “ 成功之后 ” 出现？在品牌
法律观察
2025年8月29日，行政法官（ALJ）发布最终初裁（FID），认定被告侵犯雷诺兹公司专利权利要求4和12 。2025年9月12日 ，ALJ发布救济建议（RD），建议发布普遍排除令（GEO）及136%保证金 。2026年1月9日 ，ITC委员会决定部分审查最终初裁，聚焦于专利有效性和国内产业要求的审查。本案涉及一次性电子烟雾化器市场，对行业格局可能产生重要影响。一、案件背景与程序进展 1.1 基本案情2024年6月11日，雷诺兹烟草公司（R.J. Reynolds）及其关联公
案件业绩
Recently, Attorney Deng’s team successfully represented a client in a Schedule A trademark infringement case filed by a renowned American apparel brand against an Amazon seller. At the critical moment when the client was facing the risk of
案件业绩
Case Summary • Case Number: Confidential • Jurisdiction: State of Florida, USA • Case Type: Patent InfringementRecently, Attorney Deng and his team represented a U.S. patent infringement dispute case. The plaintiff in this case filed a laws
案件业绩
Recently, a client’s product listed for sale on Amazon US was removed from the platform on the grounds of alleged infringement of an invention patent owned by a world-renowned consumer brand. The client immediately contacted Attorney Deng, e
案件业绩
Recently, Attorney Deng's Team successfully represented the patentee in issuing a legal demand letter and filing a complaint in connection with a patent infringement incident involving a cross-border e-commerce platform. This prompted Amazo
案件业绩
Case OverviewLawMay recently secured a favorable settlement in a product liability lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, representing an Amazon seller against substantial defect allegations.The Chall
案件业绩
Several months ago, a client’s trademark portfolio suffered a crisis due to attorney-related issues. Among them, the registration process of a key associated trademark in the United States hit a major snag. The United States Patent and Trad
案件业绩
LawMay recently achieved a significant milestone in a high-stakes intellectual property dispute involving an Amazon seller targeted by malicious patent infringement claims. In a declaratory judgment action filed in the U.S. District Court f
案件业绩
Case OverviewLawMay recently achieved a swift and significant legal victory on behalf of a Chinese cross-border e-commerce seller whose Amazon listings were wrongfully removed following a patent infringement complaint. In the U.S. District
案件业绩
Recently, Attorney Deng’s team represented a client in a Schedule A invention patent infringement lawsuit before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, successfully securing a ruling of dismissal with no lia
案件业绩
Recently, our team successfully represented a well-known e-cigarette brand in a fully concluded patent rights protection case. Every step—from evidence collection in the preliminary stage to the initiation and conclusion of the adjudication
案件业绩
Recently, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas officially recognized a cross-border trade arbitration award rendered by the Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration (SCIA). The legal team led by Attorney De
案件业绩
Recently, LawMay achieved a significant victory on behalf of a client in an invalidation proceeding before the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO). The trademark in question, registered in Class 25 covering sportswear, yoga
案件业绩
Recently, LawMay achieved a significant victory in a copyright infringement lawsuit involving a U.S.-based Amazon store, resulting in a complete dismissal of the case with zero settlement payment. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District