News & Insights / 法律观察 · 5/7
Notes from the Front Lines
案件业绩
Seven days after being engaged in a Schedule A design patent action in the Western District of Pennsylvania, LawMay served a motion to dissolve the TRO — and the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed.
案件业绩
In March 2026 LawMay handled four intellectual property matters across four states — platform complaints, federal actions, TRO freezes, evidentiary disputes, and a domain takedown. Each resolved by dismissal or denial within a short cycle, with listings restored.
律所动态
At a cross-border cooperation salon in Shenzhen, Claire Wu walked more than twenty companies through China's ODI filing regime — who must file, how, and what happens when they do not.
案件业绩
After five months of compressed litigation and 211 docket entries, the court ruled from the bench on the first day of trial that the ten defendants represented by LawMay owed no damages at all.
法律观察
对于亚马逊跨境卖家而言，被投诉侵权后，产品下架、销售中止是最常见的结果。许多卖家第一时间选择平台内部申诉，但结果往往不尽如人意。原因并不复杂。亚马逊的首要考量是规避自身法律风险，而非判断投诉是否实质成立。尤其涉及专利争议时，平台通常不会替代法院作出专利是否有效的判断。即便卖家掌握一定的无效证据，平台在缺乏权威裁定的情况下，倾向于维持下架状态以规避风险。这也正是 D.J. 诉讼存在的意义。一、什么是 D. J. 诉讼？D.J. 诉讼，全称 Declaratory Judgmen
案件业绩
今年春节期间，一家亚马逊跨境卖家找到我们时，账户已经被TRO冻结。美国联邦法院在单方程序下签发了临时限制令。对于跨境卖家而言，春节本是难得的休整时间，而这家卖家却在假期中面对一份已经生效的冻结令，和一个即将到来的联邦法院听证。我们在春节期间接手，立即开始工作。TRO 之后，时间就是损失 对于亚马逊卖家而言，账户冻结的每一天都意味着销售中断、库存积压、排名下滑。而 Schedule A 诉讼的设计逻辑，恰恰是让被告在毫无准备的状态下承压。原告在 ex parte 程序中单方面陈
法律观察
TRO初始期限不超过14天，PI听证前是被告应对的关键窗口。本文解答跨境卖家对美国联邦诉讼的四个常见误解：TRO签发后的时间节点、已签发的PI能否缩小范围、美国有没有简易程序，以及“强制调解”是否强制和解。
法律观察
美国知识产权诉讼通常要打18到36个月，按AIPLA统计，打到审判阶段的中位成本约60万至100万美元。本文回答跨境卖家最常问的五个问题：周期、费用、为何多数案件打不到判决、Discovery前的窗口期、立案是否要审查。
法律观察
结果速览: 2026年3月10日，美国国际贸易委员会（ITC）就337-TA-1410调查案发布最终委员会意见，正式终结这场历时近两年、牵动电子烟行业神经的专利大战。委员会推翻了行政法官（ALJ）的最终初裁（FID），认定雷诺兹公司主张侵权的所有权利要求，包括此前ALJ认定有效并构成侵权的权利要求4和12，均因显而易见性（Obviousness）而无效。调查以无侵权结论终结，行业此前最为担忧的普遍排除令（GEO）也随之落空。01｜案件走到了哪里我们上一篇文章写于2026年2月
法律观察
On March 10, 2026, the Commission reversed the ALJ and held every asserted claim — including claims 4 and 12, previously found valid and infringed — invalid as obvious. The investigation terminated with no violation and no GEO.
案件业绩
Engaged over the Lunar New Year holiday with the client's account already frozen under an ex parte TRO, LawMay completed a claim-by-claim non-infringement analysis and served its motion — and the plaintiff dismissed within hours.
法律观察
Platform appeals cannot decide whether a patent is valid. A declaratory judgment action moves that question to a federal court — and, paired with a TRO, can restore listings before judgment.
法律观察
How long a U.S. IP case actually takes, what it costs, why most cases never reach judgment, what discovery means for a seller, and why U.S. federal courts have no docketing review.
法律观察
Four recurring misconceptions about U.S. federal procedure — TRO timing, whether a preliminary injunction can be narrowed, whether a "summary procedure" exists, and what "mandatory mediation" actually compels.
案件业绩
2026年初，LawMay在一起商标侵权案件中，代理客户在缺席判决已作出且资金已被原告划走的情况下，通过程序性动议与谈判并行推进，成功追回已被执行划扣的十余万美金款项。彼时正值年末结算周期临近，客户对资金回笼的时间窗口格外敏感。该笔款项在年末资金周转节点前已经全部退回客户账户。本案原告系知名跨国企业，于2025年中旬在美国伊利诺伊州北区联邦法院针对多家跨境电商卖家发起商标侵权诉讼。客户因未能及时应诉，被法院作出缺席判决，随后其卖家账户内资金被依法执行并划扣。客户紧急委托本所介
法律观察
FDA就ENDS产品PMTA召开中小企业圆桌会议，LawMay全程参会。本文整理会议五个模块的要点：申请路径选择、健康风险评估标准、公共健康论证、临床研究设计、营销与上市后监测，以及FDA点名的申请被拒常见错误。
案件业绩
近日，由 LawMay P.C.代理的一起针对亚马逊跨境电商专利投诉下架的确认不侵权DJ维权诉讼，在历经八个月的法庭拉锯与交锋后，于华盛顿州联邦西区法院（WDWA）圆满达成和解。本案中，LawMay不仅代理客户通过一系列强有力的TRO、PI禁令实现了产品链接的快速恢复，更迫使对方回到谈判桌前，最终实现了客户利益的最大化。一、起诉回顾：主动出击，夺回经营主导权2025 年 7 月，LawMay 客户在亚马逊平台的畅销产品遭遇突如其来的不实侵权投诉，导致链接被瞬间封停。面对库存积
法律观察
产品只要进入加州销售，无论卖家设在哪里，都受加州65号提案约束。本文以问答形式汇总跨境卖家最常问的问题：哪些化学物质受管、何时必须加警告标签、10人以下企业能否豁免、违规代价，以及收到60天通知后怎么办。
法律观察
LawMay 在近期美国跨境电商合规案件中，关注到多起涉及 UL 商标侵权被起诉、被TRO、被下架的情形。相关纠纷呈现出高度一致的风险结构。涉案产品通常已完成第三方UL测试并符合相应技术标准，但卖家因对 “UL” 的法律属性存在误解，在产品展示与营销环节中不当使用 UL 商标或形成来源混淆，从而引发 UL 、亚马逊以及其他竞争对手的维权行动。该类风险在跨境电商领域具有一定普遍性，值得高度重视。一、 UL 并非中立的技术术语，而是一家公司的商标在实践中，部分卖家将“UL 标准”
案件业绩
A declaratory judgment action brought on behalf of an Amazon cross-border seller whose listings had been removed on an unfounded patent complaint concluded in settlement in the Western District of Washington after eight months of litigation.
案件业绩
With a default judgment already entered and the client's funds transferred to the plaintiff, LawMay pursued post-judgment motions and negotiation in parallel, recovering over one hundred thousand dollars before the client's year-end settlement cycle.
法律观察
A full-day FDA roundtable on ENDS PMTA submissions for smaller companies. Most rejections, the FDA said, are not about data volume — they are about data quality, broken chains of reasoning, and misreading the requirements.
法律观察
Prop 65 applies wherever your entity sits — once product enters California, the warning duty attaches. Most enforcement comes from private bounty-hunter plaintiffs, not the government.
法律观察
A test report shows a product meets a technical standard. It does not grant any right to use the UL mark. The two are separate compliance systems, and conflating them is what produces these disputes.