
法律观察
中国最高人民法院《关于依法审理涉人工智能纠纷案件的意见》要点梳理
《意见》分五个部分共24条,依托民法典、个人信息保护法、著作权法等现行法,对AI换脸拟声、网络开盒、训练数据、生成式AI服务提供者责任、AI生成内容著作权举证、开源软件责任豁免、提交AI生成诉讼材料的核实义务等作出规定。本文按五个部分逐一梳理,并说明《意见》刻意留白的两个问题。
News & Insights / 法律观察
Notes from the Front Lines
跨境 IP、产品责任、电子烟合规、337 调查 —— 我们把每一个真实案件的经验、教训和感悟记录下来。

法律观察
《意见》分五个部分共24条,依托民法典、个人信息保护法、著作权法等现行法,对AI换脸拟声、网络开盒、训练数据、生成式AI服务提供者责任、AI生成内容著作权举证、开源软件责任豁免、提交AI生成诉讼材料的核实义务等作出规定。本文按五个部分逐一梳理,并说明《意见》刻意留白的两个问题。

法律观察
2026年9月7日,最高人民法院发布《关于依法审理涉人工智能纠纷案件的意见》(法发〔2026〕10号),分五个部分共24条。本文全文转载《意见》,文字未作改动,供查阅与引用。

法律观察
Issued September 7, 2026, the Opinion runs five parts and 24 articles — the first set of AI adjudication rules from China's highest court. Two of the most contested questions were deliberately left open.
![Full Text: China Supreme People's Court Opinion on Adjudicating Disputes Involving Artificial Intelligence (Fa Fa [2026] No. 10)](/_next/image?url=%2Fimages%2Farticles%2Farticle-83.jpg&w=3840&q=75&dpl=dpl_LDRrhmWYE7GLXNxL1QsRZzv9bv2Z)
法律观察
An unofficial English translation of the Supreme People's Court Opinion issued September 7, 2026 — five parts, 24 articles, the first set of AI adjudication rules from China's highest court.

案件业绩
美国东部时间2026年5月20日,美国佛罗里达州南区联邦法院签发命令,裁定某知识产权权利人向LawMay代理的十名跨境电商卖家支付数千美金律师费。

案件业绩
近日,LawMay律师代理某跨境电商卖家,在一起美国联邦法院知识产权诉讼和解后,成功推动原告更正撤案文件,并进一步联系亚马逊解除具体ASIN限制,帮助客户恢复库存调用和产品销售。

法律观察
2026年5月29日,美国联邦第七巡回上诉法院发布了一份值得跨境电商卖家关注的判决。对于曾在美国Schedule A诉讼中被起诉、店铺链接被冻结,或账户资金被划扣的中国卖家而言,该判决可能具有重要的实务意义。

案件业绩
近日,LawMay律师团队成功代理一名Amazon跨境电商卖家,在美国伊利诺伊州北区联邦地区法院的商标侵权诉讼中促成和解,推动账户与资金解封,维护了客户在美国市场的合法权益。

案件业绩
近日,LawMay律师团队成功代理某跨境卖家,就其变色灯产品遭受的亚马逊平台发明专利投诉完成非侵权申诉,逾百条受影响ASIN全面恢复上架。

案件业绩
近日,LawMay律师团队成功代理一起因平台外观专利投诉引发的联邦诉讼案件,在美国华盛顿西区联邦地区法院(W.D. Wash.)相继获颁临时禁令(TRO)与初步禁令(PI),第一时间恢复客户产品上架,并最终推动对方签署和解协议,圆满收结。

律所动态
2026年6月13日,深圳大学法学院校友沙龙第十四期在深圳大学丽湖校区守正楼举办。

法律观察
对于向美国市场销售消费品的跨境电商卖家而言,美国《消费品安全法》(ConsumerProduct Safety Act,以下简称CPSA)第15 (b)条规定的强制上报义务,是一项容易被忽视、但后果可能十分严重的合规要求。

案件业绩
近日,LawMay律师团队成功代理五家跨境电商客户应对一起美国发明专利ScheduleA诉讼,宾夕法尼亚州西区联邦法院于2026年6月16日裁定驳回原告的初步禁令(Preliminary Injunction," PI ")申请

法律观察
2026年6月23日至24日,FDA接连发布两项数据:2025年全国青少年烟草调查(NYTS)结果及配套同行评审论文,以及一项证明公共健康广告宣传成效的重要研究。

法律观察
2026年6月26日,美国FDA发布新闻公告,宣布向《联邦公报》(FederalRegister)提交一项拟议规则(Proposed Rule)

法律观察
On May 29, 2026, the Seventh Circuit held that serving process by email alone on a defendant located in China does not satisfy the Hague Service Convention — with real consequences for sellers already subject to default judgments.

法律观察
Section 15(b) of the Consumer Product Safety Act requires immediate reporting once a seller has information that reasonably supports certain conclusions — a low threshold, a 24-hour clock, and, under Seventh Circuit authority, a duty that continues until discharged.

法律观察
Youth tobacco use hit a record low — but Chinese-manufactured brands took the top four places among youth e-cigarette users, with one holding more than 60%. That official data now gives the FDA a targeting basis.

法律观察
A proposed rule would close a decade-old gap: today only domestic manufacturers must register with the FDA. Once finalized, product from an unregistered foreign establishment would be misbranded — and refusable at the border.

案件业绩
After a competitor's design patent complaints removed the client's listings on Amazon and TEMU, LawMay obtained both a TRO and a preliminary injunction in the Western District of Washington and drove the matter to settlement.

案件业绩
On May 20, 2026, the Southern District of Florida ordered an intellectual property owner to pay attorney's fees to ten cross-border e-commerce sellers represented by LawMay, granting the full 8.6 hours claimed.

案件业绩
On June 16, 2026, the Western District of Pennsylvania denied the plaintiff's preliminary injunction motion and dissolved the TRO freezing five clients' account assets, finding the plaintiff's evidence "essentially a nullity vis-à-vis evidentiary value."

案件业绩
Representing an Amazon cross-border seller in a Schedule A trademark action in the Northern District of Illinois, LawMay pursued a parallel defense-and-negotiation strategy that produced a settlement, the release of frozen accounts, and dismissal with prejudice.

案件业绩
Settlement and payment did not restore the client's listings. LawMay filed a motion to enforce the settlement, compelling the plaintiff to correct its dismissal to one with prejudice and to secure the release of the specific ASIN restrictions.